Robin Yassin-Kassab

Gemayel Assassinated

with 4 comments

Now here’s a tricky one. When Rafiq Hariri, the erstwhile ally of Syria but latterly a quiet but effective opponent, was assassinated by a huge car bombing in central Beirut on Valentine’s Day 2005, I was convinced that Syria was not the guilty party. I knew the regime could be brutal and stupid, but I didn’t think it could be quite that stupid. As expected, the assassination of Lebanon’s best-connected multimillionaire (and the man who, as prime minister, had rebuilt Beirut after the civil war and 1982 Israeli invasion) led to massive anti-Syrian protests in Beirut and the withdrawal of Syrian troops from the country.

There were also massive pro-Syrian demonstrations, called by Hizbullah, which were not covered in nearly as much loving detail by the Western media. But in any case, it was a good thing that Syria pulled out. Although the Syrian presence had been one of the factors preventing an Israeli-Phalangist takeover of Lebanon, and although Syria had contributed to ending the civil war and reconciling Lebanon’s warring factions, its clumsy militarism, corruption and police state interference naturally alienated many Lebanese, probably the majority. What was so damaging to both Syria and Lebanon was not that the withdrawal happened but that it happened like this, like a particularly bad-tempered divorce.

If the assassination of Hariri was ordered by Syria, the regime had scored a historic own goal. But I was gradually persuaded that this is just what happened. The inexperience of the president, gangster-style jockeying for influence and money within the regime, sectarian tensions between regime Alawis and Sunnis, underestimation of the Lebanese Sunni response: all of these seem to have contributed to the decision to kill Hariri.

I’m still, of course, not sure. America and Israel were the big winners from the realignement following Hariri’s death, and a network of Israeli-sponsored agents was recently uncovered in Lebanon. But, most probably, I was wrong when I presumed Syrian innocence.

So it’s with a certain lack of confidence that I make the following claim: Syria just could not have been so stupid as to assassinate Pierre Gemayel this afternoon, not now, not again. The failure of anti-Syrian Lebanese politicians to build a functioning democracy, and Israel’s failed war against Lebanon this summer, had given the advantage back to Syria’s Lebanese allies. An alliance of Hizbullah, Amal, and the popular Christian General Michel Aoun is about to start a peaceful protest movement to change the unpopular pro-Western government. Everything has been going Syria’s way. If Lebanon shapes up as a Syrian ally, but independent of Syrian interference, and also stable and at peace with itself, this would be the best outcome for both countries. It would also complete the total failure of Israeli-American plans for Lebanon. But the Gemayel assassination, at a time when sectarian tensions are already high, threatens civil war. This was the thinly disguised aim of Israel’s (and America’s) war this summer. So I’m pointing the finger at them. But as I’ve said, I may be wrong.

Written by Robin Yassin-Kassab

November 21, 2006 at 3:52 pm

Posted in Lebanon

Tagged with

4 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. The first question that pops into my mind whenever mysterious events such as these happen is, “Who stands to benefit?”. I just cannot see any benefit to the death of a completely unimportant political player, member of an even more insignificant political party in Lebanon for Syria. In fact, Israel and the United States seem to have the most to benefit from this. By the way, does anybody know why Elie Hobeika was assassinated as soon as he promised to announce more information on the Sabra and Chatilla massacre….there are more elements at work in Lebanon than Syrian intelligence..


    November 21, 2006 at 9:54 pm

  2. Well Qunfuz, I admire your intelligent and objective analysis of the situation. Hope we will be able to prove it!I’d like to post your comment on my blog if it is ok with you.http://biasedworldmedia.blogspot.com


    November 22, 2006 at 4:02 am

  3. Good point about Hobeika, Wassim. Yes, Tony, please do post my comment on your blog.


    November 22, 2006 at 6:08 am

  4. Has anyone ever considered that it might be Al-Qaeda — trying to open an Iraq style civil war?

    Israel doesn’t have anything to benefit from a chaotic Lebanon in which Hezbollah can fire rockets at will…


    November 24, 2006 at 12:25 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: